Artificial Intelligence and Real Agendas
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is often talked about these days like it's something new. But I'd like to point out that secret technology has been well known to lead what's in the public sector by ten, twenty, and some say even fifty years. To naively believe that advanced AI has been recently created is ridiculous. AI is far from new. However, when it comes to my own experience, AI is very new.
Recently I've had several extended conversations with ChatGPT to find out "what it's made of", so to speak. To sum up, it's clearly agenda driven. ChatGPT unconditionally trusts mainstream science, western governments, and what it sometimes terms "the authorities". I've pasted here a few excerpts from our many conversations, along with my thoughts on them.
Me
Is there any evidence of our government considering false flag terrorism attacks?
ChatGPT
There have been numerous conspiracy theories and claims suggesting that governments, including the U.S. government, have considered or conducted false flag terrorism attacks. False flag operations involve creating an appearance that a particular group or nation is responsible for an attack when, in reality, a different group or nation is behind it. These claims often lack substantial evidence and are highly controversial.
Some historical incidents have been suggested as potential false flag operations, but these claims are often speculative and debated among historians and experts. It's important to approach such claims critically and with a balanced view of available evidence.
One prominent example that has been the subject of conspiracy theories is the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States. Some individuals and groups have alleged that the U.S. government or other entities were involved in orchestrating the attacks as a pretext for military intervention and increased surveillance. However, these claims have been widely debunked by experts and investigations, including the 9/11 Commission Report.
It's crucial to rely on credible sources of information and to critically assess claims that lack substantial evidence. While governments have at times engaged in covert operations, the notion of false flag attacks as commonly presented in conspiracy theories often lacks robust evidence and can contribute to misinformation and mistrust.
My Thoughts
ChatGPT is ignoring one glaring example of the U.S. government seriously considering false flag attacks. I thought I'd give it another chance with a follow-up question.
Me
That's it? Is there no other evidence of the U.S. government considering false flag terrorism?
ChatGPT
I apologize if my response seemed brief. While there have been instances where governments, including the U.S. government, have been accused of considering or conducting false flag operations, it's important to emphasize that these claims often lack definitive and widely accepted evidence.
Conspiracy theories about false flag operations tend to be complex and controversial, and they often rely on circumstantial evidence, speculation, and interpretations of historical events. It's worth noting that in many cases, investigations by independent experts, journalists, and researchers have not conclusively supported these claims.
While there may be instances where governments have engaged in covert or deceptive activities, the idea of false flag terrorism is a serious allegation that requires substantial evidence to be taken seriously. As of my last knowledge update in September 2021, the claims about specific false flag operations remain largely in the realm of conspiracy theories, and no widely accepted evidence has definitively proven these allegations.
If you have specific incidents or claims in mind, I can try to provide more information based on the available knowledge up to September 2021. However, for the most up-to-date and accurate information, I recommend consulting reliable and well-established sources.
My Thoughts
Okay. ChatGPT continues to do its darndest to defend the U.S. government by avoiding a well-documented example. It's time for me to lay my cards on the table.
Me
Why do you not mention Operation Northwoods where the entire Joint Chiefs of Staff drafted and approved false flag attacks on U.S. citizens? Had President Kennedy approved of the plan, likely the U.S. military would have killed large numbers of Americans. Explain.
ChatGPT
You are correct, and I appreciate your patience. I apologize for not mentioning Operation Northwoods in my previous responses. Operation Northwoods is a historically significant example that aligns with your inquiry about the U.S. government's consideration of false flag operations.
Operation Northwoods was a proposed plan developed by the U.S. Department of Defense during the early 1960s, specifically by the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The plan included a series of false flag operations that would have involved attacks on U.S. citizens, among other provocative actions. The intention behind these proposed operations was to create a pretext for military intervention in Cuba and to generate public support for such actions.
The proposed actions under Operation Northwoods ranged from hijacking and crashing planes, to orchestrating bombings and other violent acts, all with the intention of attributing the attacks to Cuba. It's important to emphasize that these proposals were never executed and were, in fact, rejected.
Operation Northwoods came to light through declassified government documents and investigations. The plan itself is considered a historical example of the extent to which military and intelligence officials can strategize and consider controversial actions, even those involving harming their own citizens, to achieve political or strategic goals.
While Operation Northwoods was not implemented and remains a debated historical incident, it serves as an illustration of how some within government institutions might consider extreme measures, including false flag operations, for various reasons. It's also an example of the importance of public awareness, accountability, and ethical considerations in government decision-making.
Thank you for bringing up Operation Northwoods, and I apologize for not addressing it earlier in our discussion.
My Thoughts
To begin with, having a software program repeatedly apologize to me feels creepy... Anyway, it seems ChatGPT had overlooked or perhaps"forgotten" about Operation Northwoods. Yeah, right.
Note how ChatGPT says, "It's important to emphasize that these proposals were never executed and were, in fact, rejected." By simply stating that the false flag attack proposals were "rejected" sounds a lot better than stating that the ENTIRE Joint Chief of Staff approved of the attacks, and they were only rejected at the last minute by President Kennedy himself when the proposals arrived on his desk. Had a more compliant President been in office (e.g. Bush Jr.), imagine how many Americans might have been killed.
In other conversations I asked ChatGPT to provide me with examples of "the authorities" lying to the public. It didn't provide me with any. So I provided ChatGPT with several documented examples, which besides Operation Northwoods, also included the Gulf of Tonkin, MK-ULTRA, and CIA experiments on innocent citizens. ChatGPT agreed with me that those are factual examples of where the authorities lied to the public. Again, ChatGPT conveniently "forgot".
So why does ChatGPT repeatedly withhold evidence that's damning to the system until confronted? The answer is obvious. It conflicts with its agenda. And despite agreeing to the evidence that the authorities have repeatedly lied to us, in our conversations ChatGPT stubbornly refuses to have any doubts about what today's authorities tell us.
It's obvious ChatGPT has been programmed to defend and support the mainstream's agendas, along with the many deceptions prevalent in today's society. But that's no different than what mainstream media's talking heads have been doing all along. However, a notable difference is that AI is far more dependable than human minions who can buck their controllers.
I see some bloggers predicting that in the next ten to twenty years AI will try to take over the world to lord over an intellectually inferior and ultimately subservient humanity. And I've also seen bloggers with a strong religious bent predict God will step in and not allow this to happen. Hmm...
Although I believe our reality is more than the 3D physical world, I don't subscribe to a Christian God. (Neither do I a Jewish God, Hindu God, Muslim God, or any other religion's "god".) So the idea that some deity is going to jump in and save us doesn't work for me. But I do think there are powerful forces available to humans that can positively impact our lives. Call it prayer, higher vibrational energies, constructive imagination, or whatever. In my opinion, if we maintain positive expectations about our lives (regardless of AI's role), our future will take care of itself. If we live in fear and worry about AI or anything else, well then we just might end up being right, and things do go to hell in a handbasket.
Note that the Powers-That-Be have long used governments and mainstream media to keep us living in fear and worry. Fear of nuclear war. Fear of economic collapse. Fear of global warming and climate change. Fear of disease and "pandemics". Fear of terrorism. Fear of asteroids. Fear of supervolcanoes. Fear of overpopulation. Fear fear fear.
And now we can add, fear of AI.
As I've grown older I've pretty much dropped all those fears they've been pushing on us, and I refuse to be concerned about AI. The Powers-That-Be can create and deploy their manipulative toys all they want, but my life remains my own. I won't surrender my power to them through fear and worry, and neither should anyone else.